Back to the insights archive
Legal updates

Emotional dispute over acta 2

The European Parliament has advocated a new copyright regulation, which is commonly and somewhat hasty as ACTA 2.

The European Parliament has advocated a new copyright regulation, which is commonly and somewhat hasty as ACTA 2.

The new directive is rather supported by the artistic community, but it is sometimes of concern to ordinary users.

The European Parliament has advocated a new copyright regulation, which is commonly and somewhat hasty as ACTA 2. The new directive is rather supported by the artistic community, but it is sometimes of concern to ordinary users. The question is – why?

It's certainly about copyright protection. The new regulations are intended to require larger portals to share the profit of sharing, for example, musical works and other creative activities. Currently, there is a voluntary act in this area that facilitates the use of someone else's work and the taking of all the profit for themselves.

Large portals will be required to filter the content posted there by users in order to detect any content that does not have a proper license. Many Internet users may not be delighted with the new law, but the creators are rather different. According to the House of Press Publishers:

„Article 13, which speaks of the need to remove materials in the event of a non-contractual license agreement, concerns only a narrow group of portals. It is so-called online content providers, as the Directive states. one the main objectives of their activities are to provide access to materials provided by users using the optimization of content – that is, actively promoting them for commercial purposes. The adopted text also includes a negative definition that specifies that micro- and small entrepreneurs portals, as well as online encyclopedias (e.g. Wikipedia) or online repositories, will not be covered by this regulation."

Quoted Article 13. is considered controversial by some. It can be said that this provision is some form of compromise. The Directive may impose an economic burden on the owners of larger portals, but it does not apply to the smaller ones. There is also no reasonable reason to believe that the EU authorities intend to censor the Internet.

Those suppliers who will be required to search for specific content on their portals will do so for copyright rather than ideological purposes. New Directive referred to as ACTA 2 It won't take anyone's freedom of expression on the Internet.

Author:

Expert Russell Bedford

Continue exploring our insights.

View the full archive
Legal updates

Obligations of traders to provide non-cash payments

As part of the amendment package under the noisy name Polish Deal, which most of the solutions entered into force at the beginning of January 2022, to stimulate a new impetus for the gradually growing trend in the market for non-cash payments, and at the same time to counter and combat the gray...

Legal updates

Deduction – what is involved and when possible

Deduction is a legal institution regulated in Article 498-505 KC.

Legal updates

Business secrecy in the context of changes to the Public Finance Act - comment

From 1 July 2022 information on all contracts exceeding the value 500 PLN, which from the beginning of this year have been concluded by public authorities (including JST), will be public and will be entered in the register kept by the Minister of Finance.